Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/11/09 19:14
Read: times


 		 #165240 - More detail required
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Walter Adrián Quiroga said:
I did some routines to process the commands received from a PC such as the Set_Point, the constants proportional, integral and derivative, but no me has worked.

Then you need to debug them!

See: http://www.8052.com/forum/read/136470

Can somebody help me giving me an example of how to perform a function that could read the commands received and process it.

No - you have not given nearly enough detail to make that possible!

For a start, how will you connect the PC to the microcontroller?


List of 29 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Command Processor            01/01/70 00:00      
   More detail required            01/01/70 00:00      
      Command Processor            01/01/70 00:00      
         Standard Async Serial (updated)            01/01/70 00:00      
         What is it that you need?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Command Processor            01/01/70 00:00      
               What compiler?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Code to Get command            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Buffer overflow...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
                     did you retype the code?? ....            01/01/70 00:00      
                        This code is translated            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Alternative parsing            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Code to Get command            01/01/70 00:00      
                           wasteful            01/01/70 00:00      
               I would not do this in 'C'            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Thank you            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Assembler floating point?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I didn't say he shouldn't use 'C' at all ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  'C' may not be that bad            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Just this particular function would be very fast in ASM            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Maybe; maybe not...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           The opinion that assembler is faster than C            01/01/70 00:00      
                              In this case, speed isn't a big factor.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 dead easy and it will not work if you do not            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    no (keil?) C will work if the main is in asm            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       What I was considering            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I WOULD write thsi in C            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Thta doesn't surprise me.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List