| ??? 02/05/09 11:26 Read: times |
#162098 - Sorry about that ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yes, they're both 2-cycle instructions, hence, each one of the two takes two clock ticks to complete. The shortest resulting pulse would be 80 ns as you've pointed out.
The SiLabs 100 MHz parts are apparently the only ones capable of that short a pulse. Hopefully there are some others ... I stand corrected ... <sigh> ... RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| what is the signal freuency on all ports of at89c52/51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| minimum pule is 1086 nanoseconds. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Buzz! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 40ns is a very short time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need a faster MCU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the fastest '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 80ns ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry about that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still not known if single pulse or pulse train | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where there's a will ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timer or PCA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| repeat earlier question with clarity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timing can't be discussed when C is involved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Supplementary question... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
At first blush . . . | 01/01/70 00:00 |