Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/31/08 11:03
Read: times


 		 #161236 - not used to call compiler generated asm so translate by hand
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Jan Waclawek said:
You can also translate them "by hand", if you want - FAT is not THAT complicated to write.
JW

Going to to this translation, and remove code that is useless for the application, it may help to fit into the MCU (P89V51RD2) internal 768 bytes XRAM and avoid a new prototype board with either latch and RAM chip or new MCU with more internal XRAM.

List of 48 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Asm and C            01/01/70 00:00      
   Depends!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Also            01/01/70 00:00      
         No! Not Inline!!            01/01/70 00:00      
            why not inline?            01/01/70 00:00      
               I agree with Andy (at least for Keil), but ....            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Keil specifically            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Keil and reasoning            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Jan...Take it from experience...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           can you please explain?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Example??            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I am curious            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Use these references in lieu of examples:            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I explained it earlier; example here            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I now see the point with Keil...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Often intrinsic use of inline assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Not a safe assumption?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          No, extrapolation not allowed            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          but if it is a macro...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             A limited example            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                an opinion            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Keil specifically - more            01/01/70 00:00      
               Why Not inline C            01/01/70 00:00      
               Inline assembler - Avoid! Avoid!!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  in order to keep things together            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I do            01/01/70 00:00      
                        from where I sit...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           you said it            01/01/70 00:00      
                              this has nothing to do with it            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 asm *functions* embedded in C-majority source file            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Whay Not???            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    My view point on ASM in C            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       That is the point            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 here is one - at least re Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Maybe not here, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I do not disagree            01/01/70 00:00      
   Compiler ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Get the manual when/where you get the compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
   and C in asm ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      C first?            01/01/70 00:00      
         not used to call compiler generated asm so translate by hand            01/01/70 00:00      
      if a compiler can do it            01/01/70 00:00      
      depends on the compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
         SDCC...            01/01/70 00:00      
            What assembler?            01/01/70 00:00      
               SB-asm            01/01/70 00:00      
                  In principle this should work.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  OTOH, why not simply write in ASM?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List