| ??? 08/15/05 18:17 Read: times |
#99468 - Should work Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jacob Boyce said:
Ok, so the destination address is within the boundaries of the source data, how do you let the user know that the copy has failed? Obviously, you won't just copy the data anyway, so there has to be a way to let the user know that the copy has failed. It is possible for your routine to detect the fact that the destination address is within the boundaries of the source data and still work. There is no reason for your routine to fail so there's no reason to notify the user that the copy has failed. Dealing with the issue of the source/destination address possibly being in apparent "conflict" is part of the challenge. :) Regards, Craig Steiner |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| First challenge done, new challenge up | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Seems about right to me... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2 weeks? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:challenge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "move the data intelligently" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Overlapping data is part of the challeng | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yep! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Should work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And the Winner is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A worthy winner | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one + one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Note taken | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tradeoff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| exec time and size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| exec time and size II | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Public domain.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Open source? | 01/01/70 00:00 |