??? 09/26/12 22:01 Read: times |
#188466 - None in particular ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I've not followed their "other" parts, since what I wanted was a faster, with more memory, drop-in replacement for the old Intel parts that I used back in the very early '80's for what was then fairly sophisticated machine controls. These were on COTS boards and I've been building daughterboards and putting the Dallas parts in them for some time. A daughterboard with additional and faster memory and custom logic to fiddle with the system timing has solved quite a few expansion problems that would otherwise have required complete system redesign. I've done this with little downtime for about 20 years, though the Dallas part has only been involved since 2000 or so. ADC's and DAC's haven't been involved so much in that work.
RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
.db instr does not work like before with movx A,@dptr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Brain Fade ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
memory access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Did you ever try the Maxim/Dallas DS89C4x0? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Handle the dptr with care... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dallas, Dptr, and DB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Perhaps what he means is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Make no mistake... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and also the XMEGA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
XMEGA ADC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
those samples that Andy and others were expecting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is it 2007 already?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's why I refer to them as MAXIM/DALLAS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Part Numbers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
None in particular ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |