| ??? 11/20/11 08:46 Read: times |
#184826 - UART - byte by byte or library functions? |
We always use byte level coding - send byte, clear interrupt, set stages etc. since we were not sure about the reliability of using a string sending function like UART1_Write_Text or a printf, even though we understand that in cases where UART transmission is simple without managing stages and time outs, this should work. Now we are thinking of totally switching over to functions that can send strings. We have just evaluated MikroC since we heard that it offers better reliability when it comes to simplified methods. We work with both Silabs (34) and AVR (mega8/16)
Please guide us. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| UART - byte by byte or library functions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing magic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One Reason for SiLabs Parts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the difference? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Never underestimate the value of state machines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True | 01/01/70 00:00 |