Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/21/11 07:39
Modified:
  10/21/11 07:40
Read: times


 		 #184295 - Did you ever look at that MIDE51 I previously mentioned?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
That suite has an assembler/editor/simulator with settings specific to the 89C2051 with an 11.0592 MHz xtal, and it counts "ticks" and elapsed time for you once you're in the simulator.

It would seem to me that, with that tool set, you can fiddle till your heart's content, and get pretty useable information about how fast the output pin is toggling. Now you will have to read the instructions, and you will have to do your own arithmetic in translating elapsed time into output period. You'll also have to do some other arithmetic, but, since you probably use Windows, you probably have Excel, which will do much of that arithmetic for you.

Why not give that a try? It won't cost you anything.

RE


List of 42 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Need a little help with frequency            01/01/70 00:00      
   use 89c52            01/01/70 00:00      
   "formulae"            01/01/70 00:00      
   How to post legible source code - and text            01/01/70 00:00      
      Legible source code            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not the whole message!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Thanks Andy got little messed up            01/01/70 00:00      
               Already answered            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Still not understanding isr with tick            01/01/70 00:00      
                     use may use this code            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Thanks for time            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Rewrote Source Code for Metalink Assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
                           keil assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
                           No need for picture            01/01/70 00:00      
                     try            01/01/70 00:00      
                        the code above is a typical illustration of ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           You are right            01/01/70 00:00      
                              never too old            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Never too late to pick up a new trick            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    One good trick ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Score -1            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Learn one before Jumping head            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Learning Assembler First            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          I wholehardely concur.            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Thanks also you for your time            01/01/70 00:00      
   Here's something to try ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   One suggession for higher frequency            01/01/70 00:00      
      Remember no fractional part for            01/01/70 00:00      
         Precise frequency            01/01/70 00:00      
      I did not know that            01/01/70 00:00      
         89c2051            01/01/70 00:00      
            When you wrote code            01/01/70 00:00      
               You normally always need to test - but may not need to debug            01/01/70 00:00      
               it was example            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Ok then if I            01/01/70 00:00      
                     try            01/01/70 00:00      
                     depends            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Testing Code            01/01/70 00:00      
                        In short            01/01/70 00:00      
                           someone said it better            01/01/70 00:00      
                              "Proven Product" Syndrome            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Did you ever look at that MIDE51 I previously mentioned?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List