??? 08/25/11 14:16 Read: times |
#183487 - It's the brain that needs training so specific tool isn't it Responding to: ???'s previous message |
ICD and simulation should both be mandatory. As also debug using print statements, or LEDs/GPIO.
But knowledge about splitting a problem into smaller and smaller pieces until faulty pieces can be identified should also be mandatory. And that it helps to program by contract and start directly adding code that tests required conditions - this code can optionally be removed or conditionally compiled away when getting close to release. But the reverse: to write everything and debug, and first when it works add error handling is a common way people write programs. Which means they don't have any help during the debugging. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Microcontroller Lab | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
make sure you get ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nothing wrong with simulation! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and another things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the ability to emulate is todays technology and ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Disagree! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but 'only' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More than that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
restating the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
beginning to agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
JTAG != ICE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bond out not in existence anymore | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
people should consider saying ICD instead of ICE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ICD - a joy for factory testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ebay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What kind of "lab"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But What kind of "lab"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lab | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
then on_line_debugging is mandatory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Skills - not just tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's the brain that needs training so specific tool isn't it | 01/01/70 00:00 |