| ??? 06/09/11 11:44 Read: times |
#182553 - Very nice to learn this important matter Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Per Westermark said:
Your text indicates that you still are convinced that the compiler should do exactly the same thing in assembler just because you see the same thing in C. ...... ...... ...... The total set of rewrite rules used by the compiler is too vast, so even the compiler developer would need to look at trace output to find out the exact rules evaluated by the compiler, and what weight the rules got, and which priorities that was then used. Really nice & helpful draft for all the beginners (including me) who assume that the compiler should work as they predict. Thanks for such a nice and detailed draft. Sandy |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Compiler variations?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fundamental philosophy of High-Level Languges (HLL) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and so what | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stop wondering about the compiler output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very nice to learn this important matter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly what you wrote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile sbit may be the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read up on (not) volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look at my profile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not offence intended | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| defining P0_6 so that compiler doesn't treat it as volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Skip the goto - almost always exists beautiful rewrites | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Goto really is a bastard code construct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and therefore ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Will come back with modified code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wonderful as always! | 01/01/70 00:00 |