Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/21/11 21:41
Read: times


 
#181226 - Plagiarism
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Per Westermark said:
But both texts also mentions 8052.com, which shouldn't happen if both texts are from any bible material.

Ah yes; I see it - in the description of the Undefined Instruction:

http://www.stc-51.com/resources/8051_Instruction_Set.php said:
Note: We received input from an 8052.com user that the undefined instruction really has a format of Undefined bit1,bit2 and effectively copies the value of bit2 to bit1. In this case, it would be a three-byte instruction. We haven't had an opportunity to verify or disprove this report, so we present it to the world as "additional information."


http://www.8052.com/51und said:
Note: We received input from an 8052.com user that the undefined instruction really has a format of Undefined bit1,bit2 and effectively copies the value of bit2 to bit1. In this case, it would be a three-byte instruction. We haven't had an opportunity to verify or disprove this report, so we present it to the world as "additional information."


Certainly looks like a pretty clear case of plagiarism!

As Konstantinos found it, I guess he should be the one to take the credit & notify Craig...

List of 8 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8052.com and stc-51.com share the same docs?            01/01/70 00:00      
   An 8051/2 is an 8051/2            01/01/70 00:00      
      Reference Documentation            01/01/70 00:00      
         You may be right            01/01/70 00:00      
      Same architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
         Plagiarism            01/01/70 00:00      
   What is copy right?            01/01/70 00:00      
      8052.com site and copyright(s)            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List