| ??? 04/21/10 14:42 Read: times |
#175225 - Andy, did you mean Responding to: ???'s previous message |
BTW: 200ms could be rather a long time to sit in a delay loop - you should consider whether a Timer would be more appropriate...
Did you mean no delay loop (timer controlled or otherwise) whtsoever, just the timer interrupt causing the needed action to take place. Erik Not trying to nitpick, but the first time I read you post I read "timer controlled delay loop" |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Delay routine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not *generally* true! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Andy, did you mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Something like that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Busy loops sometimes ok | 01/01/70 00:00 |