| ??? 06/03/08 12:58 Read: times |
#155433 - Much better than repeating the codes. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Still better than just dumbly repeat the codes. ยด
Much better, actually. If you repeat the code once, you can reliably detect all 1-bit errors, but you cannot correct them. If you repeat twice, you can also correct all 1-bit errors, but fail at correcting 2-bit errors. With a proper hamming code, you need far fewer bits and get multi-bit detection and correction capabilities. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| math quiz of the week | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hamming distance. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you know the answer already? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I am interested in the result, of course... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here's the table: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks - this is what I needed originally. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Much better than repeating the codes. | 01/01/70 00:00 |