??? 04/16/08 15:56 Read: times |
#153510 - Mixing modes on UART Responding to: ???'s previous message |
One place where polled Tx makes sense is with smarter UARTs with hardware fifos, like those on ARM controllers. There's less overhead by loading up a fifo (polling fifo full flag) and waiting for a single tx interrupt when the fifo empties. I don't know of any 8051s that use fifos.
Another use of polled tx, especially if the data rate is low, is to ensure there is a gap between characters. When the baud rate generator isn't exact, say 1-2 percent error on clock rate (or same on receiver end) then sending long strings of data at the fastest possible rate may result in a missed bit. A small gap between bytes generated by the nature of asynchronous polling instead of synchronous interrupts allows time for the remote receiver to realign the bit sampling window. I do this with some SiLabs 8051 controllers to compensate for the 2% variance in the internal oscillator, though I use a timer to generate a gap instead of polling TI. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Interrupt-driven Rx, polled Tx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this is why we have the FAQs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe I'm crazy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if you do that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Polled transmission | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mixing modes on UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Here's why I asked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the risks of doing things the "wrong way" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the old nugget | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cool idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is the \"wrong way\" risky, or just stupid? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
explanation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks. I understand now what you are saying | 01/01/70 00:00 |