| ??? 12/10/07 13:41 Read: times |
#148038 - trivial, maybe, but why not use a 'trivial' uC Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The requirement is too trivial for a MCU.
trivial, maybe, but why not use a 'trivial' uC. You can get e.g. NXP LPCs for less than a buck and I doubt you can get 'logic' to do this for less. Maybe 'trivial' in function but not 'trivial' in cost. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Looking for a one of six selector chip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HMM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sounds like you need a PAL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| have you looked at 74HC237 with a 1 Hz clock? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh-Oh-Use-Mcu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Driving is easy. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is dead easy but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Current, not voltage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Practise and Theory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I decided to settle for the MCU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Memory relays and reset problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So ... you\'re using a latching relay? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Example of a solenoid driver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| chip driver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, that's the kind of thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, voltage, not current! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AC solenoids | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thread morphing... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PLC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| trivial, maybe, but why not use a 'trivial' uC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Trivial microcontrollers | 01/01/70 00:00 |