Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/12/07 07:55
Read: times


 
#144433 - corrected FAQ
Responding to: ???'s previous message
http://www.8052.com/faqs.phtml?FAQ=123234

this is not a new FAQ, but corrections made:
- a typo, so it said that "80(C)51 have (OTP)EPROM" (of course it is "87xx")
- a clarification added to the "89C5x" section, stating that some higher end (and ISP-able) derivatives have a misleading name consisting of "89C51" AND a suffix (such as the RD2).

Thanks to Erik Malund for pointing out both problems.

JW


List of 17 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
New FAQ III.            01/01/70 00:00      
   Similarly for 'C'            01/01/70 00:00      
   floating point            01/01/70 00:00      
      "fixed point" FAQ by Erik Malund            01/01/70 00:00      
   corrected FAQ            01/01/70 00:00      
   on 3V3 and 5V            01/01/70 00:00      
   when a RC "debouncing" circuit goes wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
   basic interrupt hints            01/01/70 00:00      
      the C hater            01/01/70 00:00      
         better?            01/01/70 00:00      
            very condensed but clear            01/01/70 00:00      
               it's good sometimes to violate the rules            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Rule breaking            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The idea of keeping the ISR routine short...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        epanded            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Exactly            01/01/70 00:00      
               flags            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List