Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/03/07 03:25
Read: times


 
#141434 - Update from the OP
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Jan said:
I tried it but as I said it was too big of a behemoth and maybe a bit too slow on my standard working machine (PIII/866, I know no state-of-the-art, but fits my needs of small embedded programming :-) ). The speed penalty came apparently from running it under cygwin or something similar.

But this all was some 2 years ago or so, when I started to be intereseted in the miniLA project (I've mentioned it here already I think). I had a look now and the screenshots look very different of what I remember, so there must have been a lot of changes since then...

I got a chance over the weekend to download this program and play with it some. It will accept its input in several different formats. Among these, the VCD (value change dump) format stood out as fairly simple and easy to understand, partly because it's a plain text file that you can experiment with using your favorite text editor. From what I understand, it's also a fairly standard format that's used by lots of other EDA tools.

Anyway, I made an AWK script to translate the log files produced by my firmware into VCD files suitable for input to GTKWave, and had some waveforms on the screen in fairly short order. Digital signals looked great. Analog signals were okay, except it seems to auto-scale them vertically and doesn't bother to put any kind of labels on the vertical axis to tell you the signal values. I found that to be fairly annoying.

I found the program to be just a tiny bit clunky, not so much because there's really anything wrong with it, but just because its interface is a slightly different than what you'd expect from a Windows program. That's easy enough to understand, of course, because it's not a Windows program! It has its roots in *nix. I used a Windows port, and although it didn't need cygwin as the earlier version that Jan mentioned apparently did, I did have to install a great big pile of DLLs before it would run. It seemed speedy enough on a 1.7 GHz laptop with 1/2 Gig of RAM.

All in all, this turned out to be a pretty good deal. The price was right (free), it was easy enough to get running, and it will probably be useful every now and then in the future.

-- Russ


List of 11 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Event/Status Log Display Program            01/01/70 00:00      
   GTKWave            01/01/70 00:00      
      labview            01/01/70 00:00      
         The big guns ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         re: LabView            01/01/70 00:00      
      Hmmm            01/01/70 00:00      
         GTKWave            01/01/70 00:00      
   What about Excell?            01/01/70 00:00      
      I'd support EXCEL            01/01/70 00:00      
   Update from the OP            01/01/70 00:00      
   gnuplot            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List