??? 10/24/06 13:57 Read: times |
#126941 - yes, but so can an 'undetected error' be Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yes, a plug is expensive, but, since Richard is to do testing, I guess it is an industrial app.
In such a setting, what is the cost of the Mickey Mouse scheme failing? I remember a case where a lot of boards passed the test, was installed and failed. The cause for a major rework cost was the tester having a problem. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
PLCC52 plug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what about a socket? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have the socket! I need a plug! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If you are non-competing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Emulation Technology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
plugs are pretty expensive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, but so can an 'undetected error' be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
here's one option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bad link and (good) link already given | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, you have to remove the \"<>\" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
GAGHCKKK! another double-post! | 01/01/70 00:00 |