| ??? 09/25/06 16:55 Read: times |
#125028 - that was not me, but Andy Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
that was not me, but Andy Lots of code is dependent on precise timing. the statement was about execution timing Yes many things depend on a maximum exection timing and many depend on a preceise timing, but those are apples and oranges. If you happen to depend on a minimum execution timing your code is best desribed by a word not to be used in a family friendly forum. The issue in this thread is not "timing" pre se, but execution timing which, when an optimizer can tilt the apple cart is not considered as it should be. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| debuging C code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Management solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I kind of hope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| False assumption | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to HLL or not to HLL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Things for which an HLL cannot be trusted... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sometimes there's no other way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that was not me, but Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timing - end of wrong stick | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thats not the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| better, don't use C at all.. :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| experience and knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the key word is "manifest" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NASA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| against NASA rules, sorry Andy posted before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In the real world | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worse than that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
customers complaining or not ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |