??? 08/06/06 17:27 Read: times |
#121752 - Not sure about that Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hasn't posted in a while and don't have tieme to check properly.
If I remeber well the int i; for(i=0;i<plop;i++) is valid and i is available out of the body of the for int i=0; for(;i<plop;i++} is equivalent for(int i = 0;i<plop;i++) is valid, but the scope of i is just the inner loop code for(i=0;i<plop;i++}) is valid, if you are using microsoft Visual C++ version 6 which doesn't comply with standarts at all C compilers usually dont guess types, specially because C is weakly typed language and that the size representation of a type is quite important (ok there is the sizeof macro), but the one who never used some (.... syntax erors excluded) #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN CODE #elsif CODE' #endif with CODE breaking a data type for serialisation or any other processor word size aligned composition can send me the first stone. This being said, I haven't checked, so I might be wrong Best, Ben |
Topic | Author | Date |
spot the difference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C++ magic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so, who's got a C++ for 805x? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wrangling the architecture to do something it was | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more shome sort of mishtake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not sure about that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C++ and C99 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IAR has C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
new sdcc c99 switches | 01/01/70 00:00 |