Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/14/06 04:43
Read: times


 
#114278 - Triacs are problematic
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Triacs have a poorer dv/dt and di/dt rating, so they are susceptible to spikes. Because they are bidirectional, they are tough to get working with highly inductive load or load that has non unity power factor. Always better to use back to back SCRs, though Thomson CSF did make more rugged triacs, I do not know if they are available.
Back to back SCRs require slightly more complex firing circuit as compared to Triacs, so for simpler apps, triacs make the whole circuit cheaper.
But quite a few device manufacturers do make back to back SCR modules for high power apps.


List of 9 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Why Triacs dont contain two real SCR.            01/01/70 00:00      
   Triacs are problematic            01/01/70 00:00      
      Read the specs            01/01/70 00:00      
      Re: Problamatic triacs.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Triacs VS SCR            01/01/70 00:00      
         alternistors            01/01/70 00:00      
            Re: Alternistor.            01/01/70 00:00      
               back to back ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Silicon area costs money            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List