| ??? 11/04/05 20:29 Read: times |
#103295 - Really? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Terry Lingle said:
There is a diligence requirement in defense of a patent. Is it? I thought that was the case with trademarks (i.e. can't let your trademark go generic) but wasn't the case with patents and copyrights. I.e., I thought that just because you didn't enforce a patent or a copyright doesn't mean that you lose your right to do so elsewhere; but that if you let your trademark slide into generic use, you essentially lose the right to try to defend it. Of course, I could be wrong. I'm not a patent lawyer. I'm not even a lawyer, period! Regards, Craig Steiner |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| BLDC motor invention | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| new motor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good luck! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...andkeep very, very quiet.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what a tease | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Motor Building | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Patent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| publish better than patent! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sad, but true story | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Other option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and also | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| patents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Really? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
patents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| contact me | 01/01/70 00:00 |