| ??? 12/21/13 09:18 Read: times |
#190208 - RE: Far too many queries fail to define "working" Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
Far too many queries fail to define "working" Yes - that was the point of my two reply posts titled, "'working fine' (sic)"! To many - including, aparently, the OP - "working" just means, "we tried it a few times and didn't notice any issues". They don't have any concept of verifying conformance. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Old PS2 Keyboards (White) Working, New Keyboard not working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "working fine" (sic) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PS2 Keyboards are not working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "working fine" (sic) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe this will help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here's a link that might be useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dead horse? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Far too many queries fail to define "working" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Far too many queries fail to define "working" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The difference between "Engineering" and just hacking? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The core of engineering is not experimenting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| experimenting equals .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes ... likewise, believing the first page of the datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: believing the first page of the datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Exactly! | 01/01/70 00:00 |