| ??? 11/08/13 13:33 Read: times |
#190104 - HUH? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
the glaring deficiency is the lack of proper source-level debugging.) The uVision seems to offer me what I need.
there is no such deficiency. I source level debug happily What you are missing is that to soucre level debug, you have to use the SILabs IDE. I'm sure this is part of the "lock this free Keil to SILabs only" doings Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Keil uVision4 Struggles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm using the SiLabs IDE Suite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Debugger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Silabs and ASM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you think it's possible... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| familiar editor and assembler/linker | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC Resources? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why use Keil ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lack of features... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what features? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| these.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| date/time and code checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dammit! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any symbol listing info ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OMF Conversion? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No LST is unusual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C8051F850 documentation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for SILabs chips | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Great Info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| screaming and kicking | 01/01/70 00:00 |