| ??? 06/12/12 21:25 Read: times |
#187684 - If you can't get MikroC to work ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... and don't want to use a mainstream compiler ... well, there's always ASM. That's what I'd do ...
If you don't want to do that, then why not listen to the others who've suggested you use Keil, or SDCC? RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| help me with 93c46 and at89s52---MikroC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What You Need to Do Yourself | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| need help - 93c46 using AT89s52 - mikroc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MikroC is unwise choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| help me with 93c46 and at89s52---MikroC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So check without scope - adjust code until testable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you have now 3 times asked help with 93c46/at89s52--MikroC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 93c46/at89s52--MikroC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You have already been given suggestions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| help me with 93c46 and at89s52---MikroC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use a proper Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I wanna, I wanna, I wanna, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Time to actually prove your logic and your delays | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ----thanks all for helping out | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you REALLY expect .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you can't get MikroC to work ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| switching to keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Example code on this website | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why, oh why | 01/01/70 00:00 |