| ??? 01/17/12 10:28 Read: times |
#185523 - 0x00, 0x01, 0x02?? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
you mean this notation: 0x01
I think it ok cause I've been using it for everything I've done so far. You think I should stick to using this notation: 0001h? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Conditional Statements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hex constants? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 0x00, 0x01, 0x02?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is the octothorpe? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| # | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Immediate or not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is an octothorpe? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Previously, on 8052.com | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem solved, query still remains | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do some trial and error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check the CJNE instruction... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Handy that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| run time vs compile time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IF only at assemble | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not Really!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hw variants or debugging are big users of conditionals | 01/01/70 00:00 |