??? 04/06/11 15:05 Read: times |
#181748 - Startup Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
I'd take exception with the notion that the MCU shouldn't execute his code if it's assembled for execution at 0x000. There's a big proviso there. So long as he's absolutely certain he's not initialized the MCU, which it appears he hasn't, no interrupts should occur, so his lack of reset or interrupt "vectors" should be just fine But the point was that the specific processor was not stated. Many modern processors do have stuff - apart from just interrupts - that would be required to be set up properly. Usually they try to make it so that the chip will "just run" like an Original Intel 8051 - but you shouldn't really rely on it |
Topic | Author | Date |
My port does not do as my program | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tested... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Details of components | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How a microprocessor/microcontroller starts... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just a minute ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Vectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Difference between 8051 "Vectors" and ARM "Vectors" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
All in a name | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sort of | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Vectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There are many ways to skin the proverbial cat ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
placing an entire ISR in the space available | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
vectors and vectors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Startup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Found the problem !!! | 01/01/70 00:00 |