| ??? 03/08/11 08:22 Read: times |
#181489 - main concern is code operation. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
When a bit type is used in function parameters, what registers / flags come into picture?
Our main concern is to make the code more simplified by making use of bit type, rather than unsigned char. But, what is the actual impact on the code execution internally? How will the compiler treat this issue? What is the _BIT_GROUP_ storing, and how can it handle the bit function parameters without conflict, as our code is running with code banking? Will there be overlay analysis for bits also? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| bit type function parameter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look at instruction set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is your actual problem here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| main concern is code operation. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| parameter converted to global variable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No reentrancy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is it the 8051 instruction set? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still looked at the bit capabilities of the processor? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need to ask Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use bool to simplify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BOOLEAN directive used | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stdbool | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use stdbool | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optimal implementation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optimal for what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
both | 01/01/70 00:00 |