Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/14/11 07:17
Modified:
  01/14/11 07:18

Read: times


 
#180579 - I realized that...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Andy Neil said:
Jan Waclawek said:
... if the calling convention of IAR is known, you could adopt the library for use in assembler or other C compiler..

You would also have to know the library file format, and figure out some way to extract the code from the library & link it to the other toolchain...

I realized that later... but was lazy to get up from the warmth of the bed to the cold of the night, fire up the computer and make another post... ;-)

It could probably be overcome using the time-limited version of compiler (registered by a helpful friend possibly), "exporting" all the relevant functions from the library by using a series of stubs. Not the cleanest and easiest method, though, at the verge of reverse engineering. Variables locating sounds like one of the big problems.

But I agree that IAR should be asked for assistance first.

JW

List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Recommended Low Dollar Compiler/IDE for C++ & TIMAC            01/01/70 00:00      
   IAR eval            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: IAR eval            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: IAR eval            01/01/70 00:00      
      Re: IAR eval            01/01/70 00:00      
          Re: IAR eval            01/01/70 00:00      
   Academic            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Academic            01/01/70 00:00      
         Locked-in            01/01/70 00:00      
            Re: Locked-In            01/01/70 00:00      
   in theory...            01/01/70 00:00      
      It's worse than that...            01/01/70 00:00      
         I realized that...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List