??? 01/14/11 07:17 Modified: 01/14/11 07:18 Read: times |
#180579 - I realized that... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Jan Waclawek said:
... if the calling convention of IAR is known, you could adopt the library for use in assembler or other C compiler.. You would also have to know the library file format, and figure out some way to extract the code from the library & link it to the other toolchain... I realized that later... but was lazy to get up from the warmth of the bed to the cold of the night, fire up the computer and make another post... ;-) It could probably be overcome using the time-limited version of compiler (registered by a helpful friend possibly), "exporting" all the relevant functions from the library by using a series of stubs. Not the cleanest and easiest method, though, at the verge of reverse engineering. Variables locating sounds like one of the big problems. But I agree that IAR should be asked for assistance first. JW |
Topic | Author | Date |
Recommended Low Dollar Compiler/IDE for C++ & TIMAC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IAR eval | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: IAR eval | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: IAR eval | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: IAR eval | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: IAR eval | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Academic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Academic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Locked-in | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Locked-In | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
in theory... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's worse than that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I realized that... | 01/01/70 00:00 |