| ??? 06/30/10 08:44 Read: times |
#176992 - Thanks Munish... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Munish,
Just wanted to say thanks for posting your multi-tap solution. I'm sure your source-code comments and your explanation will help me to ultimately get a firm grasp on its ingenious mechanism. I got quite a few good tips out of this thread, so thanks for posing the development exercise publicly, Munish. Thanks also to everyone for the great programming and design tips :-) Regards, Murray R. Van Luyn. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Ideas for Multi-tap keyboard routine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just follow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Multi-tap is not too difficult | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two-step operation. Keyboard input + post-processing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| State Machine! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agree 100% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Time to code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Software Timers! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Practical Limits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't lock up in infinite loops everywhere | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In the pseudo code... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| State Machine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Divide by 5 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timer resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| State Machine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Looks not bad programming practice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using Timer May Still be Possible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Done ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very Cool!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compare with zero is better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Avoid ISR jitter using timer T1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Munish... | 01/01/70 00:00 |