| ??? 03/03/10 10:40 Read: times |
#173772 - overheads Responding to: ???'s previous message |
i dont mind them being a few clock cycles out to be honest, the program need not be strict to within even a few nanoseconds, i was thinking about using a macro for delays in nanoseconds using the compiler to insert nops, but i really think that for now the timer should be accurate for what I am using it for.
could you make a comment on whether you think it would be better to reset the timer at each delay call, or whether i should write code to account for the overflow reset? cheers for the comments thus far guys, Joel |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| fixed length delays in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can't do it without assembly. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HLL gives no guarantees | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using a timer in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| overheads | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use a dedicated timer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-functional code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupts aren't the biggest problem ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
break apart | 01/01/70 00:00 |