??? 03/01/10 09:49 Read: times |
#173675 - Wrong Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Neil Kurzman said:
password[cnt2] != passINP[cnt2])
Is comparing the address of the arrays. which in this case are different. Huh? Why do you assume that? Surely if both password and passINP are char arrays they can be compared this way. It might even result in smaller code size. Maarten |
Topic | Author | Date |
Question about KEIL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It ain't how i would do it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
using strncmp for a password check is a bug :^) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yeah whatever | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interesting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Eh?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
40 instead of 50000000![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nothing to do with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmmm I see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem solved! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do you undrestand why it did not work? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, it's wrong - but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
code size decrease | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
After a nights sleep | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where it gets specific to Keil (or whatever) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Explain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Woops. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
such a 'newb' error (sic) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Password application | 01/01/70 00:00 |