??? 02/18/10 13:23 Read: times |
#173246 - as the matter of fact... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... this header is not included in the installation (although I don't Keil and what I have is some demo which came with a devkit - nevertheless it appears it does have the full collection of headers).
I'd say this might be quite easily an omission on Keil's side, so somebody might perhaps want to notify them. Just a sidenote, thanks to Maarten Brock's (and others' of course) work, most SDCC headers for '51 derivatives should be usable with most of the other '51 C compilers, too - unfortunately the P89V51RD2-related one is not been made compatible with the "enabling" compiler.h header... JW |
Topic | Author | Date |
which header file for P89V51RD2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You don't have to use a header file | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
okay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Or, as you are using Keil, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
as the matter of fact... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wasn't that hard... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what issue? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sure, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The issue that it was missing from the installation!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"bug" in keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what most would do ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |