Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/16/10 15:38
Read: times


 
#172513 - Indeed, a very poor design!!!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Gopal said:
Moreover this capacitor is charged from a +12V DC while the ADC is driven from a 5V regulator. That seemed a poor design but I wanted a hint on what exactly is wrong and yes your answer is very helpful.


Oops! This means, that some inputs of multiplexer are overdriven all the time? Indeed, this is a very poor design, because some ADCs behave very strange if the input multiplexer is overdriven. Even if it is only a neighbour channel that is overdriven, this can upset the AD-conversion of a channel with regular level!!

Better, to feed the pots from the ADC's 5V-supply. Or, put at least a resistor in parallel to this cap, to form a voltage divider which prevents the input of ADC from being overdriven all the time. Adding only a protection diode might not be enough, as it cannot prevent the input from being overdriven.

Kai Klaas

List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
ADC0809 problem            01/01/70 00:00      
   Is the very same ADC chip in both cases?            01/01/70 00:00      
   From time to time...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Datasheet read, same hardware            01/01/70 00:00      
         Define 1000000000%            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thoughts...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Solved partially            01/01/70 00:00      
               So the cap did help?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: That cap did help?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The input multiplexer is damaged!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Discharge diode            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: The input multiplexer is damaged            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Indeed, a very poor design!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: Indeed, a very poor design!!!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List