??? 01/11/10 14:31 Read: times |
#172338 - But it's not an omission! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
How does this matter as long as the data flash CAN be used through IAP? Because the fact that the datasheet specifically and explicitly says that it can be done can lead you to waste a whole load of time fruitlessly trying to find out how! It also leaves that nagging doubt that the datasheet is actually correct and there is a way... And the IAP, as you say, is not (very) convenient. Datasheets are notoriously full of similar omissions. It's not an omission - it is an explicit statement that is, apparently, wrong. Let this be the worst of it. No! (potential) users should complain loudly so that Wiznet correct it! |
Topic | Author | Date |
Wiznet W7100 questions.... accessing data flash? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nope, both start at zero.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yup, movx doesn't do it as far as i can tell.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Writing to flash - in general | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We cannot open the assembler instructions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
data flash API is through IAP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
documented quite concisely - but also contradictorily (!) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but how does it matter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But it's not an omission! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
potentiality of users | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sad, but true - but WIZnet beware!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So they do! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
core by DCD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why do you believe that, Jan? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hint is the debugging tool... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Now I've not read THIS datasheet ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |