| ??? 08/16/09 11:48 Read: times |
#168356 - many, many moons ago ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If not, I will have to change the code,
for simulation purposes only. When the '51 was not yet 'it' but "investigated at no cost" I tried that. Did I ever make a TOTAL mess. Yes, I know, you can handle that, but so thought I. I recommend strongly that you find another way. Why the "not Keil" in the first post? BTW what are you making. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dual DPTR debugger? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what style of dual-DPTR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89C51ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what 'debugger'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simulator.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so many options.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that will work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dallas won't work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| many, many moons ago ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check the Dallas datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't use Dallas chips | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not worth much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It all depends on what you mean by "debugging" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Funny stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89C51ED2 BETA version released | 01/01/70 00:00 |