??? 07/09/09 18:13 Read: times |
#166947 - Kai, you are so sharp, I am impressed that .... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... you could deduct from the first post
1) that using an alternative was not possible 2) that Charles had fully considered 1) 3) that charles had investigated each and every alternative Erik PS there are some posters here that, because they posted an 'intelligent' post here a year ago, ASS U ME that each and everybody will recall their level. Charles may be the sharpest tool in the shed and he may be a rank amateur, I have no knowledge, and so far no illustration has been provided in this thread. |
Topic | Author | Date |
looking for 89S51 or 89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89S52-24PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
do you insist on Atmel? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
YES, ATMEL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WHY | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WHY NOT? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No reason? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one of the strongest reasons I know would be... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there are other ISP chips | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: No Reason? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is a question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this forum is dying real fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it is a fact ..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ok,ok,ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Questions is part of forum discussions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"why" is often vital | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I fully aggree with you... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Kai, you are so sharp, I am impressed that .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
quantities | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ATMEL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Atmels Page | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I can't see prices on the site... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Location Specific, You Bet!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good price | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
For the other Atmel Part | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
at89s52-24pu![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |