| ??? 06/11/09 07:01 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Informative |
#166005 - Still missing the point! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Sandeep Gupta said:
why is PC-Lint not supporting such coding style? It's not that PC-Lint doesn't support it. The point is that it's telling you that you have not provided sufficient detail to make it explicitly clear that the code you have written does exactly what you require - nothing more & nothing less - and will continues to do so in all circumstances. Note that there are configuration options to tell PC-Lint about the implementation-specific features of Keil. You need to post the smallest complete example that illustrates your "problem" - so that we can see it in context. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| PC Lint warning: Toggling WatchDog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to post legible source code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check what happens if you use ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try This | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Toggling Watchdog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tried ! yet? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Toggling WatchDog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still missing the point! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| W_D_TIMER = 0xfffe; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is correct for Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not a hole in the C spec | 01/01/70 00:00 |