??? 06/10/09 10:55 Read: times |
#165978 - Corrected! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Per Westermark said:
Correction - the hexadecimal representation of decimal 65 would be 41, not 40. Oops - so it is! I have corrected the original post - in case someone reads it without seeing the follow-up! Hope that doesn't get too confusing... BTW: The character represented by ASCII code 0x40 is '@' |
Topic | Author | Date |
transmit/recieve character by using 8051 and USART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Be sure your 8251 is fast enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
conver ASCII to bin and viceversa and interface | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
translate ASCII to binary ? [edited] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
65 base 10 = 41 base 16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Corrected! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
binary to hex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Text representation of numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
connection with HyperLink | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
unplug and plug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Question about Polling method for send recieve data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, and no![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |