??? 05/03/09 12:57 Read: times |
#165023 - yes and no Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Kai, I agree with your advice; however I would test it in an emulator. The OP ask for simulation, which, in my opinion only does half the job. The pitfall with a simulator is that you can 'prove' that your software works and then, if you have a hrdware glitch, there is no other diagnostic than "it does not work". I have some misgivings about the simulator 'proof' since no simulator verifies that the timing is 'acceptable' to the hardware. When I have problems like this I 'grow' the software, rather than writing the whole kit and kaboodle in one go and then asking "why does it not work"
Erik An example of 'growing' software: first write a routine that reads a register, make that work with the emulator, then write a register, read it back, make that work with the emulator, then ... |
Topic | Author | Date |
Simulating 12887 RTC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
simulating an ic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
your description is not descriptive enough! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I *did* think hard before posting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I wouldn't emulate it... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes and no![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |