??? 04/14/09 05:10 Read: times |
#164568 - You're right within the scope of your thinking Responding to: ???'s previous message |
but since there's no information about the source format, whether it's vector or bitmap, postscript, or whatever, what you say here, Per, while probably quite true, is only marginally relevant.
If the input is a bitmap to be rotated (n*90) degrees the rotation will be quite tricky if it's presented at 1536 dpi to be rendered at 75 dpi. Until the O/P fills in the gaps, lets stop "flapping our gums" about what probably doesn't interest the O/P any longer. RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
How to print graphs on a printer at centronix port by 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Assume nothing! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Specifications donot provide protocols | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So you need the technical specifications! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Its a low cost Standalone system | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
01/01/70 00:00 | ||
the protocol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
some links | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The signaling protocol is well-defined | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actually quite simple to use a matrix printer. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Questions of definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A graph normally requires graphics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Indeed, but one is a subset of the other. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You would do banded output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
suppose the data is presented in portrait format ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Band size doesn't matter so much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It only feeds in portrait format | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You're right within the scope of your thinking![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |