??? 04/08/09 11:00 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Informative |
#164490 - Found it! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Presumably, then, SFRX is a special SDCC extension - for an SFR mapped into Xdata space? Yes - found it: http://sdcc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sd...iew=markup For SDCC, compiler.h said:
# define SFRX(name, addr) __xdata volatile unsigned char __at(addr) name For Keil C51, compiler.h said:
# define SFRX(name, addr) volatile unsigned char xdata name _at_ addr etc... So not actually specific to SDCC - but a "portable" macro provided by compiler.h Neat. |
Topic | Author | Date |
How to access memory mapped 8255 with SDCC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
also asked here: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8255 with SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong question? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not on the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh yes it is! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use XBYTE macro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Isn't there a problem with that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oops. I used a wrong example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Portability | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
like this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about a macro in ASM, callable from 'C'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This is HOW I will Prefer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LST output of my previously posted code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try the comparison | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unnecessarily complicated! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NOT UNNECESSARILY | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You are mistaken | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Array or pointer similar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That should not be necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SFRX(...,. ..) worked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SFRX - presumably, that's an SDCC extension? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Found it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Found it!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |