| ??? 03/30/09 06:00 Modified: 03/30/09 06:03 Read: times |
#163980 - do it in ASM! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
precise timing should not be attempted in any HLL. If you can't use the timers, then you MUST do the timing in ASM. HLL's are often totally unpredictable in their execution timing. You can, of course, write the timing in ASM and call it as a function from HLL.
RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| INTERFACING AT93C46A(EEPROM) WITH P89V51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you have no idea ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Delay loops in 'C' (or any other HLL) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to post legible source code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| delay's functions are not that useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do it in ASM! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's wrong, exactly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MY FINDINGS AND HARDWARE CONFIG | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can your device support a 16-bit write? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not understood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16 bits or 9 bits? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8 bit controller,64*16 bit eeprom | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 |