??? 03/24/09 07:53 Read: times |
#163812 - A bit too hard Responding to: ???'s previous message |
More specifically: Don't juse a high-level language to implement the delays with just a busy-loop with a magic loop count.
C is ok to use when the delay is long enough that it is meaningful to poll a hw timer or use an interrupt handler. And better C compilers should have correctly handled nop constructs to implement minimum delays (no guaranteed upper bound) of a number of instruction cycle lengths, for example when toggling a processor pin. But a HLL should never be used to generate loops of fixed length without "binding" the timing to some hardware of known speed. |
Topic | Author | Date |
EEPROM 25AA1024 and 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
do You really need delays? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do NOT write delay loops in 'C' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A bit too hard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Duplicate thread!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |