??? 05/06/10 10:03 Read: times |
#175747 - danger, danger Responding to: ???'s previous message |
This circuit will also be given to my client.
danger, danger as stated, the Atmel oscillators are finicky and "your client" may find that a crystal works in "This circuit" and will then come to you "the crystal works, what is wrong with your design" If there is any other circuit that will tell me about the frequency or the quality of the crystal, that will also be helpful. the frequency: a scope, the quality, well, that is realtive, the benchmark should be "a quality good enough for the uC you use" Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Capacitor Value of MCS51 for Crystal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What frequency? Fundamental or overtone? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reply to Kai Klass | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Equivalent series resistance is the critical parameter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WHY? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Of course!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks to Erik, Kai and others | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Presumably because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oscillator frequency. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why not having a look into the datasheet? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks David Prentice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Your setup should include the micro...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i had this problem before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reply to Arun Kumar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
may be this will help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Arun Kumar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
danger, danger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Only the AT89S8253 is problematic! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
clarification appreciated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I only recall the ones... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
with no interest ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik, you hurt me... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no hurt intended | 01/01/70 00:00 |